Although I had naturally formed opinions about iPads, I had until now kept quiet as any opinion would have been largely hypocritical, given that I had never used one. My main opinions resulted from drawing comparisons between what I had read about Android and the iPad (yes, contrary to common American grammatical butchery, the iPad is an entity not a concept and therefor the word “the” should undoubtably be used). This largely focused on price and ecosystem but no longer, as I am fortunate enough to be able to borrow one for a weekend to kick the tires!
I recently went back to using Swype, the predictive keyboard for Android on which you join letters together in a single movement. I do like Swype, and but I’ve had to leave it again as I feel it is getting worse.
Despite being in beta, and it has no excuses as it has been in beta for at least two years (the entirety of my previous phone contract, and my time using Android). Although on a relatively new phone (Galaxy S3), the constant freezing got too much, much and the perpetual nature of the beta doesn’t fill me with confidence unfortunately.
With some recent security scares surfacing in the online bloggoshpere – dropbox being one of them (do a quick google) I read an article explaining the concept of two step authentication.
Two step authentication is essentially an attempt to improve the security of the widely accepted password system used online.
The trouble with a password is – as I’m sure you’re aware – if someone has your password, they can access your account, shopping list, email, social media or whatever service the password protects. The issue progresses further as the same password often protects all of these services, rather than just one.
Two step authentication works on the principle that the password and a second piece of information is required in order to access the account. Some banks have used this system for a long time with online banking. – A small card reader which generates a short code which protects certain transactions (not log ins).
To protect a service, the user enters their password as normal, and they are then prompted for a second code which changes on each log in attempt. This may initially seem like a giant PIA, however when associated with important services it is a small inconvenience – when implemented correctly.
I use a password management service (LastPass – which is excellent by the way), and this service by its nature, protects a lot of log in details. Two step authentication with LastPass works as such:
Log in with LastPass password, open Google Authenticator app on your phone (iOS + Android) and enter the code it generates.
It really doesn’t take long and there are numerous “oh my God, I’ve lost my phone” options to access / secure your account.
The same applies for Google logins too – both on Android and the web.
Google’s system goes one step further (as it covers numerous services) in that “application specific” passwords can be generated so for example, the password authenticating my Google account on my phone and be instantly revoked, thus disconnecting my handset from my google account. It also makes my Google services much more difficult to get into in the first place.
One caveat is that there is the option to ‘trust’ the computer when loggin in – disabling the two step authentication. This isn’t too much of an issue though as all Google services can be remotely logged out from, thus re-enabling the two step authentication.
Two step authentication is coming to more and more services, with Dropbox next on the list (when the next update is released) and I would strongly (and highly!) recommend enabling the option wherever possible.
I just wanted to add a list of services which support this service that I’ve come across so far:
WordPress! (Via Google Authenticator plugin – read their website as it needs enabling before protection is active).
I’ve just rented a movie from Google Play Movies and thought I’d post a small review of my experiences.
Firstly, at 99p (in a sale) the rental was very good value, and with some movie rentals at £2.50, and therefore competitive with pay as you go LoveFilm there was some hope.
Or so I thought.
Rented films have to be watched within 30 days of renting – this is ok and is reasonable enough.
Once playback has been started, you have 48 hours before the rental expires. Considering they are competing with the likes of Netflix, LoveFilm and iTunes, most of which offer monthly recurring plans, this seems strange. I understand that some kind of limit has to be placed on the rental, but why not a 30 day rental (or even a 14 day rental), scrapping the expiry once playback has begun.
You can sync rented movies to your Android phone, to playback offline. This is simply a necessary feature. It does however disable the option to watch the rented film in a browser – you can’t split your 48 hours of viewing between mobile and desktop without repeatedly re-downloading the movie to your phone.
You can watch on a desktop, but only in the browser. When buffering (in a YouTube player) video playback was often stuttery. Now I know my hardware can play back 1080p YouTube content, so there is something different about this flash only player. Video played smoothly once the entire film was buffered, and was good quality, at a max. of 720p for the particular film I rented (which was released in 1976 and so would not have benefitted from any higher resolution). In addition, and although having not tried this with standard YouTube content, it is not possible to use dual monitor functionality when playing rented movies in the browser. Once the lightboxed player is full screened, other tabs cannot be opened and used whilst full screen (I was using the latest version Chrome on my mac).
Or…I hear if you somehow find yourself in posession of a verion of the film as an .avi, it plays pretty much anywhere, for as long as you want. I would never encourage the aquisition of films in such a format however, when faced with inconveniences between the content and the enjoyment of the content there is little wonder why the path of least resistance is often followed by consumers.
An homage to the classic Nokia snake, for Android. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dsd164.snake97
Having recently got a new phone and having left Virgin Mobile for T-Mobile, I wanted to post my reaction to the handset and service.
Given the hype surrounding this handset, the and endless amount of reviews already available, I wanted to express my opinions more in the form of a reaction to the common criticisms found in said reviews, rather than in the form of my own mini review.
Firstly, battery. I felt details were sketchy whilst I was reading reviews and yes, I’m impressed. With average-heavy use I still seem to have approx. 40% battery remaining at the end of the day. It’s reassuring to know there is capacity available for giving the phone a hammering when needed (like Dead Trigger!).
The ‘flimsy’ plastic back panel – not a problem. Yes if you remove the back it is a flimsy piece of plastic. But I can more than comfortably agree that this is to keep the weight and thickness down. The phone is light enough that a thicker back plate would likely make a noticeable difference to the device’s weight, and how often is the back going to be off anyway really? When attached, the plastic back plate it firmly in contact with the solid body and battery, and so feels as strong as the back of any other phone I’ve used.
Speed – is noticeable from the upgrade from my original HTC Desire. I’ve not seen the device stutter, but the most noticeable improvement is when installing apps. Often there is no ‘installing’ message, just a ‘successfully installed’ notification.
The handset did feel quite slippery when I first started using it. Once I got used to its weight and holding it, I didn’t find this a problem anymore. I do have a rubber case on the way (for a whole 99p), but we’ll see how that goes.
File transfer is a bit of a pain, compared to the removal drive method used previously. This is because there is one partition for storage and a protocol called MTP is used. This is supported natively on Windows, but required a download from Android.com on a Mac. The PS3 doesn’t support this system unfortunately though, which is Sony’s fault not Google’s.
The screen seems to be more repellant to dinner prints and general grime, which is great. Yes the colours may not be as realistic as with the LCD equivalent screen but to my eyes out looks great and it’s not like I’m going to be colour correcting on the phone.
I’m very happy so far!
I decided to root my Desire so I thought I’d post my experiences. Firstly, the purpose of rooting was to extend my interest in my Desire as it nears the end of its two year contract. Having used a 3rd party launcher for some time the next step was rooting really, as the only way to change the system further is to install an completely new OS. Secondly, I had also had confirmed that I was eligible for an upgrade, so I had a safety net if everything went horribly wrong (which is a possibility when rooting, make no mistake!).
There was dispair on my part when Spotify announced the 5 plays per track policy, not because I use Spotify heavily, simply because I (and many others) saw this move as the end of Spotify. I am trying to understand Spotify’s logic; if people aren’t paying for premium subscriptions, how is attempting to force them to pay likely to work? It is a well known fact that when the general (music loving) public don’t like something, corporations forcing them to pay money for things always works – I mean look at how few people use P2P and torrent technology!
As far as I was concerned, if I wanted to listen to a track I might use Spotify, although the previews on sites like Amazon (my favourite) are usually adequate enough to decide whether I like a track or not (it’s mainly a whole album yes / no situation for me any way, to be honest). Or I could just not bother with it at all. I was done.
Apple recently rejected a magazine app from the app store because the subject was Android. God forbid people should find out how much greener the android grass is!
Being able to read about the topics you choose, via the methods you choose is a most basic right. Ok so at the moment you are free to use the interweb to read about topics of your choice, but is it just me or are Apple likely to keep pushing this as far as they damn well like? As I’ve said before, it’s their architecture, app store and hardware so they can do what they like. Granted, if they go too far they well drive customers away, but not until their contacts are up, and everyone seems blind to the less pleasant side of the iPhone experience anyway.
Blind, or reluctant to admit they are unhappy with their new buddy for the next 2 years?
After a post about Evernote beta, I am now ruining the official 2.0.1 version and the improvements from the beta are dramatic to say the least! The program is now seemingly stable and although cautious,i haven’t lost a note yet. (I have been waiting for the ‘ uploaded’ notification to appear, which I don’t think was in the beta).
The improvements are dramatic to the point I am considering the benefits of a premium account, although they don’t quite seem as plentiful as one might desire.
I am building a Pro Tools shortcut list in Evernote, and a premium feature is offline note storage which would allow access to the shortcuts where internet connectivity is limited.
Is does seem slightly wrong that offline storage is a premium feature, given that titles are now stored offline, but the contents are not. With text notes a greater amount of information could be stored in the title than the actual note! The stored titles are not searchable when offline, which is frustrating.
I am led to question software which makes you feel like you have been tricked into needing paid features, rather than needing them as they offer additional functionality.